Using composites to manufacture complex products such as the load-bearing structure of an aircraft requires designers to consider specific material and fabrication limitations when creating designs. The difference between conceptual design and composite manufacturing is so great that approximately 80% of manufacturing costs are based on design decisions made at the conceptual design stage of a composite component.
This course will focus on helping composites designers
Identify key manufacturing constraints: by following a systematic approach to evaluating the manufacturing process relative to the design steps.
Implement DFM for automated manufacture of composites: by following the design process flow provided.
Improve the manufacturability of a composite design: by understanding how the design decisions influence the manufacturing process.
Digitize tools to improve manufacturability: by quantifying what constitutes good composite manufacturing and embedding the knowledge within digital design tools.
The article highlights the presently conceptualized and tried approaches as mentioned below. these approaches have been designed around the provided constraints e.g. available resources, time to project, minimum failure, data gathering, analysis possibilities, etc.
The article highlights the challenges posed to composites designers. The specific nature of the problem makes the best approach indeterminate due to too many variables. The two key aspects to understanding the problem can be summarized in the two following points
Challenge 1: Designing for novel manufacturing processes: If the design is using a novel manufacturing material/process, and the manufacturing constraints are not fully understood,
Challenge 2: Digital tools' Best practices: If the digital tools used to create the design are derived for use with a different material or process. A strategy for using digital design tools in the context of DFM is required.
The fundamentals of composites design along with a step-by-step guide for achieving a manufacturing optimized design. The key difference of the approach presented here is that it considers manufacturing and material as an integral part of the design process. below are the links to quickly jump to respective sections
The focus is on understanding the key steps in designing structural composites with examples of aerospace components; i.e. wing and fuselage.
A focus on thin-walled structures made up of continuous unidirectional fibers in a polymer matrix
The link between CAD, CAM, and CAE tools is described in the context of structural design for composites
Parameters needed to describe mechanical properties are segmented for their analytical significance. e.g. the dimension and the location of plies for localized regions with constrained curved fiber radius
The optimization techniques are highlighted for the design and analysis phases utilizing the anisotropic nature of composites
Composite structure designs are challenging due to the wide range of design variables e.g. materials, laminates, and interactions. The use of a design tool speeds up the process and allows investigation for an optimal solution. The focus is on structural design tools at different stages of the design process.