1960–1980: Automated Tape Laying
The 1960's were a Golden Age for composites manufacturing. The ongoing Space Race between the USA and USSR required innovative solutions to make the most advanced and safest space-bound structures. Considerable funding on both sides was put into R&D for these structures, and a unique manufacturing method of composites was created: automated tape laying (ATL). Since then, it grew in popularity among the space and military sectors. The so-called tapes were wide rolls of thermoset pregreg, capable of laying up 1, 2, even 3 meter wide sections at a time. As great as it was, it did have some downsides, which are being realized more and more today.
Using the wide rolls in ATL created considerable amounts of waste, but when beating the other guys was the only thing that mattered, material efficiency wasn't a priority. Nowadays, reducing manufacturing waste in composites is a main topic of research, and the way to achieve material savings is through using narrower tapes, or fibers.
1980-Today: Automated Fiber Placement
In the 1980's, suppliers started taking their wide rolls of material and began "slitting" it into many smaller widths, now known as "slit tapes". This allowed for tapered sections to be laid up, creating a near-net-shape preform. Thermoset carbon fiber prepregs were the material of choice for this process, but this started to change. The common widths for these slit tapes are 1/4" (6.35mm), 1/2" (12.7mm), and 1" (25.4mm).
Thermoplastic material suppliers quickly recognized their materials might also be used in the same ways if machine technology could be adapted. This improves material savings further, since the thermoplastic can be melted away and separated from the fibers, allowing for reusability. Popularity in this field of research has been continuously growing for the past couple years, with the promise of being the material of tomorrow.
The advent of 3D printing with continuous fiber
As 3D printing became commonplace in manufacturing for more industrial applications, 3D printing with continuous fiber has found its niche in structural components. Today, there is a slew of technology aiming towards achieving the higher fiber volume fraction, faster print of larger structure, or low-cost equipment to make composites more mainstream.
Trend towards hybridization
As technology is constantly evolving, we start to see more of a combination of technologies. A good example of hybridization is the system from Electroimpact. They performed thermoplastic AFP layup on a 3D printed mold, within the same cell using the same system. This is a step change in manufacturing efficiency, as the same system can 3D print a mold, then create a carbon fiber part from that mold.
On a smaller scale, this same process can be achieved by combining systems. Desktop 3D printers are becoming larger, and are more capable of producing accurate components. These components can be treated as a substrate on which thermoplastic tapes can be laid up on as a reinforcement. Addcomposites is one of the only companies that can offer a fiber placement system on this scale, that would be strategic to implement this method.
Let's provide a real example from a growing industry that has to make these types of decisions regularly: air mobility.
Striking the right balance for your application
Yen, a product engineer, needs to choose manufacturing technology for the production of the door that consists of different components: door panels, handles, and the mechanism that will allow automatic opening/closing.
As the air mobility company is just getting off the ground, the production quantity needed will remain under 1000 parts per/year, and the design will likely change frequently as changes are made for various reasons. In order to make the smartest decision for his company, Yen has to take many considerations into account.
Possible Production Technology
AFP (Thermoset) using 3D printed molds
AFP (Thermoplastic) on a 3D printed substrate
Both production technologies have their pros and cons. Assuming both approaches would meet the criteria, then it comes down to the cost and time of implementing each system. The AFP (Thermoset) on an easily 3D printable molds is the most effective solution for the door panel application for a number of reasons, one of which is that the mold will be able to be reused cure after cure, further saving costs.
For manufacturing the door handles, Yen could choose the 3D printing of the handles, then layup a few layers of reinforcing thermoplastic fiber to further increase strength. For the hinges or other mechanisms, Yen could choose the continuous fiber 3D printing option, creating strong and complex geometries, albeit at a slower rate.
Day after day, we at Addcomposites discuss application suitability with our customers and partners. We believe an open discussion always helps in choosing the best option for your application, even if it means deciding to go another route. Reach out to us at firstname.lastname@example.org for a chat! Let's make advanced manufacturing accessible to all.