TLDR

Enhancing the Mechanical Properties of 3D Printed Polymer Components

Technical drawing and representation of the designed honeycomb structure

Additive manufacturing (AM) or 3D printing has gained widespread use for fabricating polymer components, from prototypes to final products. Various AM techniques have been developed, such as Stereolithography (SLA), Selective Laser Sintering (SLS), and Fused Deposition Modelling (FDM). FDM is the most widely utilized system for polymer AM manufacturing, offering relatively low costs, low material consumption, and ease of use.

However, one of the main drawbacks of 3D printing technology has been the low mechanical strength of the raw materials used. The most common materials limit the use of 3D printing to prototyping and modeling, without being able to produce usable products, as they are weak and brittle.

To address this issue, researchers have focused on developing fiber-reinforced 3D printed materials. Several studies have reported 3D printing structures reinforced with different kinds of short fibers or inclusions. One of the latest efforts in this direction has been made through the application of Continuous Fiber Fabrication (CFF) 3D printing machines, which lay continuous composite fibers, such as Kevlar and carbon fiber, inside 3D printed thermoplastics to improve their mechanical properties.

The current study aims to investigate the mechanical behavior of 3D printed fiberglass-reinforced nylon honeycomb structures using a CFF 3D printer (Markforged Mark Two). By selectively reinforcing the honeycomb structures with continuous fiberglass, the researchers hope to significantly enhance the mechanical properties of these 3D printed polymer components, making them suitable for more demanding applications.

Low Mechanical Strength of Raw Materials in 3D Printing Technology

SEM microstructure of the cross section of nylon and nylon/fiberglass showing that (a) the  glass filament (within the red dotted circle) contained empty space around fiber bundles and (b) the 3D printed specimen contained no extensive visible porosity

One of the main challenges faced by manufacturers and researchers in the field of 3D printing is the low mechanical strength of the raw materials used. Most common 3D printing materials, such as PLA and ABS, are relatively weak and brittle compared to traditional engineering materials. This limitation restricts the use of 3D printed parts to prototyping and modeling applications, hindering their potential for producing functional, load-bearing components.

The low mechanical strength of 3D printed parts can be attributed to several factors:

  1. Material properties: The polymers used in 3D printing have inherently lower strength and stiffness compared to metals or ceramics.
  2. Anisotropic behavior: 3D printed parts often exhibit anisotropic mechanical properties due to the layer-by-layer fabrication process, resulting in weaker interlayer bonding.
  3. Porosity: The presence of voids and gaps between the deposited layers can lead to reduced density and lower mechanical strength.
  4. Print parameters: Inadequate print settings, such as low infill density, thin wall thickness, or improper layer adhesion, can further compromise the mechanical performance of 3D printed parts.

As a result, manufacturers and researchers have been actively seeking solutions to enhance the mechanical properties of 3D printed components. One promising approach is the incorporation of fiber reinforcement into the 3D printing process, which has the potential to significantly improve the strength, stiffness, and overall performance of the printed parts.

Investigating Mechanical Behavior of 3D Printed Fiberglass-Reinforced Nylon Honeycomb Structures

a) 3D view of the fiberglass reinforced honeycomb structure (reinforcement in positions  2–4), (b) central fiberglass-reinforced honeycomb structure. Figure 3. (a) 3D view of the fiberglass reinforced honeycomb structure (reinforcement in positions 2–4), (b) central fiberglass-reinforced honeycomb structure

To address the issue of low mechanical strength in 3D printed polymer components, the current study focuses on investigating the mechanical behavior of 3D printed fiberglass-reinforced nylon honeycomb structures. The research team employed a systematic approach to fabricate and characterize these reinforced structures:

  1. Nylon filament with glass fiber reinforcement was used.
  2. A Continuous Fiber Fabrication (CFF) 3D printer (Markforged Mark Two) was utilized for fabricating the honeycomb structures.
  3. Two infill strategies were applied: Concentric fill and Isotropic Fiber fill pattern.
  4. The geometry of the test specimens was created using CAD software and sliced using Eiger software.
  5. Specimen design considerations included wall thickness and reinforcement positioning.
  6. Different positions of the fiberglass reinforcement along the build axis were investigated.
  7. Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) and Energy Dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy (EDX) were used to analyze the microstructure and fiber distribution of the 3D printed specimens.
  8. Nanoindentation tests were performed to determine the material parameters, such as elastic modulus, of the nylon and nylon/fiberglass specimens.
  9. Flexural tests were conducted using a universal testing machine to evaluate the bending behavior of the 3D printed cellular structures.
  10. A Finite Element Model was developed to simulate the 3D printed fiber-reinforced honeycomb structures.
  11. The experimental results were compared with the FEA results to validate the model and gain further insights into the mechanical behavior of the reinforced structures.

By employing this comprehensive approach, the researchers aimed to gain a deeper understanding of the mechanical properties and behavior of 3D printed fiberglass-reinforced nylon honeycomb structures, paving the way for the development of stronger and more functional 3D printed polymer components.

Significant Improvement in Flexural Properties with Continuous Fiberglass Reinforcement in 3D Printed Honeycomb Structures

(a) Force-deflection curves of experimental and FEA for Nylon, Nylon FG central and Nylon FG, top 2–4 positions; and (b) typical deformation (mm) response of the FE model under threepoint bending. Figure 9. (a) Force-deflection curves of experimental and FEA for Nylon, Nylon FG central and Nylon FG, top 2–4 positions; and (b) typical deformation (mm) response of the FE model under three-point bending.

The study demonstrates that the incorporation of continuous fiberglass reinforcement in 3D printed nylon honeycomb structures leads to a significant improvement in their flexural properties. The key findings and solutions are as follows:

  • Nylon/GF Central specimens exhibited a 61% increase in flexural strength compared to pure nylon specimens.
  • Nylon/GF 2-4 specimens (with fiberglass reinforcement in positions 2 and 4) showed a remarkable 141% increase in flexural strength.
  • Nylon/GF Central specimens demonstrated a 166% increase in flexural modulus compared to pure nylon specimens.
  • Nylon/GF 2-4 specimens achieved an impressive 432% increase in flexural modulus.
  • Nylon/GF Central specimens exhibited an 84% increase in flexural stiffness compared to pure nylon specimens.
  • Nylon/GF 2-4 specimens showed a substantial 243% increase in flexural stiffness.
  • The study revealed that the position of the fiberglass reinforcement within the honeycomb structure significantly influences its mechanical properties.
  • Placing the fiberglass reinforcement near the top and bottom surfaces of the honeycomb (positions 2 and 4) resulted in the highest improvement in flexural properties.
  • The experimental results were found to be in good agreement with the Finite Element Analysis (FEA) results.
  • The FEA model provided reliable predictions of the mechanical behavior of the 3D printed fiber-reinforced honeycomb structures.

The significant improvement in flexural properties achieved through continuous fiberglass reinforcement in 3D printed nylon honeycomb structures opens up new possibilities for the application of these lightweight and stiff cellular structures. The research suggests that by strategically placing the fiberglass reinforcement within the honeycomb structure, manufacturers can create 3D printed components with enhanced mechanical performance, suitable for more demanding applications in various industries.

References

we would like to express our gratitude to the authors of the research paper titled "Mechanical and FEA-Assisted Characterization of 3D Printed Continuous Glass Fiber Reinforced Nylon Cellular Structures", Evangelos Giarmas, Konstantinos Tsongas, Emmanouil K. Tzimtzimis, Apostolos Korlos, and Dimitrios Tzetzis, for their valuable contribution to this study. Their dedication and expertise have been instrumental in advancing our understanding of the mechanical behavior of 3D printed continuous glass fiber reinforced nylon cellular structures.

We appreciate Evangelos Giarmas, Konstantinos Tsongas, Emmanouil K. Tzimtzimis, Apostolos Korlos, and Dimitrios Tzetzis' efforts in conducting a comprehensive investigation, which included the fabrication of honeycomb structures using a Continuous Fiber Fabrication (CFF) 3D printer, the examination of microstructure using Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) and Energy Dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy (EDX), the evaluation of material properties through nanoindentation tests, and the validation of experimental results using Finite Element Analysis (FEA).

The insights gained from Evangelos Giarmas, Konstantinos Tsongas, Emmanouil K. Tzimtzimis, Apostolos Korlos, and Dimitrios Tzetzis' research have the potential to revolutionize the field of 3D printing, enabling the production of stronger, stiffer, and more functional polymer components for various applications. We commend Evangelos Giarmas, Konstantinos Tsongas, Emmanouil K. Tzimtzimis, Apostolos Korlos, and Dimitrios Tzetzis for their significant contribution to this field and look forward to their future research endeavors.

What's Next!

Discover the future of composite manufacturing with Addcomposites! Here's how you can get involved:

  1. Stay Informed: Subscribe to our newsletter to receive the latest updates, news, and developments in AFP systems and services. Knowledge is power, and by staying informed, you'll always have the upper hand. Subscribe Now
  2. Experience Our Technology: Try our cutting-edge simulation software for a firsthand experience of the versatility and capability of our AFP systems. You'll see how our technology can transform your production line. Try Simulation
  3. Join the Collaboration: Engage with us and other technical centers across various industries. By joining this collaborative platform, you'll get to share ideas, innovate, and influence the future of AFP. Join Collaboration
  4. Get Hands-On: Avail our educational rentals for university projects or semester-long programs. Experience how our AFP systems bring about a revolution in composite manufacturing and leverage this opportunity for academic and research pursuits. Request for Educational Rental
  5. Take the Next Step: Request a quotation for our AFP systems. Whether you're interested in the AFP-XS, AFP-X, or SCF3D, we are committed to offering cost-effective solutions tailored to your needs. Take the plunge and prepare your production line for the next generation of composite manufacturing. Request Quotation

At Addcomposites, we are dedicated to revolutionizing composite manufacturing. Our AFP systems and comprehensive support services are waiting for you to harness. So, don't wait – get started on your journey to the future of manufacturing today!

Quick Contact

Stay Updated with Our Latest Innovations