Traditional AFP systems lock manufacturers into a compromise: use narrow tapes everywhere for maximum steering capability but accept longer cycle times, or use wide tapes for speed but struggle with complex features. The AFP-XS eliminates this compromise through its standard multi-width capability, allowing seamless transitions between tape widths to match the geometric requirements of each part section.

Traditional AFP systems lock manufacturers into a compromise: use narrow tapes everywhere for maximum steering capability but accept longer cycle times, or use wide tapes for speed but struggle with complex features. The AFP-XS eliminates this compromise through its standard multi-width capability, allowing seamless transitions between tape widths to match the geometric requirements of each part section.

Technical Specifications: Precise Width Control

Standard Configuration

The AFP-XS ships with three standard tape width options:

• 1/4 inch (6.35mm) - Optimal for tight radii and complex steering
• 1/2 inch (12.7mm) - Balanced performance for moderate complexity
• 1 inch (25.4mm) - Maximum efficiency for straight runs and gentle curves

Extended Capabilities

The system's flexibility extends beyond standard configurations:

• Narrow tape capability: Can accommodate tapes down to 1/8 inch (3.175mm), provided the material has sufficient stiffness to prevent buckling during placement
• Wide tape option: A specialized AFP-XS configuration can handle tapes up to 2 inches (50.8mm), effectively functioning as an Automated Tape Laying (ATL) system for large, simple geometries

Changeover Process

The tape width change process is manual but optimized for efficiency:

• Time required: Under 5 minutes for complete changeover
• Timing constraint: Changes must occur between passes, not mid-pass
• Process: Manual spool change followed by program adjustment
• No specialized tools required for standard width changes

Placement Speed and Accuracy

Contrary to intuition, wider tapes often improve placement accuracy:

• Wider tapes reduce the cumulative effect of robot positioning variations
• Fewer passes required means fewer opportunities for positioning errors
• Gap and overlap tolerances are easier to maintain with wider tapes on appropriate geometries

Compaction Force Distribution

The AFP-XS maintains a consistent 700 Newton maximum compaction force regardless of tape width, but the pressure distribution varies strategically:

• Narrow tapes (1/4"): Concentrated pressure (higher PSI) for maximum compaction on complex curves
• Wide tapes (1"): Distributed pressure (lower PSI) suitable for flat or gently curved surfaces
• Force remains constant; pressure (force/area) adapts to application needs

Cut/Add Length Consistency

Minimum cut/add length remains constant across all tape widths, simplifying programming and ensuring consistent starting/stopping capability regardless of the selected width.

Standard IR Heating Configuration

The baseline AFP-XS includes an IR lamp system with these specifications:

• Coverage area accommodates up to 1-2 inch tape widths
• Power adjustment for narrower tapes to prevent overheating
• Consistent heating across the full width range

Alternative Heating Options

For specialized applications, particularly with thermoplastic materials requiring higher processing temperatures:

• Hot air gun: Provides focused heating for narrow tapes, available as standard equipment option
• Flash lamp heating: For thermoplastics, with quartz block sizes typically in 1" or 2" widths
• Laser heating: Available with zoom optics for variable width adaptation (specialized configuration)

Production Rate Mathematics

Consider an L-section part with multiple ply orientations:

Scenario: 0° plies along length

• With 1/4" tape: 100 passes required
• With 1" tape: 25 passes required
• Result: 75% reduction in number of passes, approximately 4X faster for these sections

Scenario: ±45° plies over corner radius

• With 1/4" tape: Optimal conformity, no wrinkles
• With 1" tape: Would require multiple cuts and likely manual intervention
• Result: Quality maintained while preserving production efficiency

Material Cost Impact

The economic benefits compound through the supply chain:

1. Raw material costs: Wider master rolls cost less per unit area (reduced slitting operations)
2. Inventory efficiency: Stock fewer SKUs of wider rolls rather than multiple narrow widths
3. Waste reduction: Use optimal width for each feature, minimizing trim waste
4. Labor savings: Fewer passes mean reduced operator oversight time

Optimal Width Selection by Feature Type

The relationship between tape width and geometric complexity follows predictable patterns:

Use 1/4" tape for:

• Radii < 50mm
• Steering angles > 30°/meter
• Ply drops in critical load areas
• Precise ply boundaries

Use 1/2" tape for:

• Moderate radii (50-100mm)
• Gentle steering (15-30°/meter)
• Transition zones between simple and complex features

Use 1" tape for:

• Straight or gently curved sections
• Large radii (>100mm)
• Minimal steering (<15°/meter)
• Build-up of thick laminate sections

Material Compatibility

Multi-width capability performs consistently across all composite material systems:

• Thermoset prepregs: No width-related processing changes required
• Thermoplastic tapes: Width changes may require heating adjustment

Dry fiber placement: Particularly beneficial as wider dry tapes are more stable

Current Capabilities

AddPath software provides comprehensive multi-width support:

• Visual path planning with width-specific trajectory generation
• Physics-based simulation showing realistic tape behavior including:
  
  • Gap prediction at width transitions
  • Overlap visualization at convergent paths
  • Wrinkle prediction on complex curvatures
• Time and material estimation with width-optimized calculations
• Seamless data exchange with FEA packages through mesh centroid mapping

Programming Workflow

1. Import part geometry from CAD
2. Define ply boundaries and orientations
3. Software suggests paths based on geometry
4. Engineer selects optimal width for each zone
5. Simulate to verify gap/overlap compliance
6. Generate CNC code with embedded width change commands

Future Development Potential

While not currently available, an auto-optimization feature for tape width selection represents a logical evolution. Such an algorithm would analyze:

• Local curvature at each point
• Steering requirements
• Production time weighting factors
• Material cost parameters

This enhancement would further streamline the engineering workflow and ensure optimal width selection across complex parts.

Case Study: Complex Aerospace Bracket

Consider a carbon fiber/epoxy bracket with varying geometric features:

Traditional single-width approach (1/4" only):

• 450 total passes required
• 8.5 hours machine time
• 12% average gaps in corners requiring manual fill
• Material cost: $X per part

Multi-width optimized approach:

• 180 total passes (1": 95 passes, 1/2": 45 passes, 1/4": 40 passes)
• 3.2 hours machine time
• <3% gaps, no manual intervention required
• Material cost: $0.65X per part

Results:

• 62% reduction in manufacturing time
• 35% reduction in material cost
• 75% reduction in manual touch labor
• Improved part quality with fewer defects

Training Requirements

While no specific multi-width training program is mandatory, successful implementation benefits from:

• Understanding of tape width vs. geometry relationships
• Experience with AddPath programming for multi-width applications
• Knowledge of material-specific width limitations
• Practice with changeover procedures

Best Practices for Width Selection

1. Start with geometry analysis: Map part features by complexity
2. Consider fiber orientation: Some angles favor specific widths
3. Account for material behavior: Stiffer materials may permit wider tape on moderate curves
4. Simulate before manufacture: Verify gap/overlap predictions

Document optimal combinations: Build institutional knowledge for similar parts

Multi-Width as Standard Equipment

Unlike competing systems that treat variable width as a premium upgrade, every AFP-XS includes multi-width capability as standard equipment. This philosophy reflects AddComposites' understanding that manufacturing flexibility shouldn't be optional—it should be foundational.

Return on Investment

For typical aerospace manufacturers producing complex parts:

• Payback period: 6-18 months based on material savings alone
• Additional benefits: Increased machine utilization, reduced labor, improved quality
• Capability expansion: Parts previously outsourced can be produced in-house

The multi-width capability positions manufacturers for emerging trends:

• Increasingly complex geometries in next-generation aerospace structures
• High-rate production demands in automotive and renewable energy
• Sustainable manufacturing through optimized material usage

Digital thread integration with AI-driven width optimization

The AFP-XS multi-width tape capability represents more than operational flexibility—it's a fundamental enabler of modern composite manufacturing. By allowing manufacturers to match tape width to geometric complexity dynamically, the system eliminates the traditional compromises between speed, quality, and cost.

For manufacturers evaluating AFP systems, the question isn't whether you need multi-width capability—it's whether you can afford to operate without it in an increasingly competitive landscape where production efficiency and part complexity continue to rise.

To explore how AFP-XS multi-width capability can optimize your specific applications, contact AddComposites for a detailed consultation and process simulation for your parts.

*Special configuration required

Specifications Summary:

• Standard widths: 1/4", 1/2", 1"
• Changeover time: <5 minutes
• Compaction force: 700N (constant)
• Minimum cut length: Constant across widths
• Material compatibility: All standard AFP materials
• Software: AddPath with physics simulation
• Availability: Standard feature on all AFP-XS systems